Iran is now such a strategic threat that it made confrontation unavoidable. By the time of the current conflict, Iran was widely understood to possess the technical capability to produce multiple nuclear weapons on relatively short notice. Even short of full nuclear deployment, it could assemble radiological “dirty bombs,” which—while less destructive—would still have severe economic and psychological impacts if used.
At the same time, Iran made substantial advances in intermediate-range ballistic missile technology, enabling it to project power across the Middle East and beyond. This capability, paired with a potential nuclear or radiological payload, represents a major shift in regional deterrence dynamics.
Equally important is Iran’s network of proxy forces, including Hamas and Hezbollah. These groups already demonstrated their ability to launch large-scale missile attacks and maintain persistent threats against Israel and neighboring states. Given time to rearm and reorganize, they would again become destabilizing forces capable of triggering broader regional conflict.
Iran also holds a powerful economic lever: the Strait of Hormuz. With fortified positions and asymmetric naval capabilities, Iran has the means to disrupt global energy supplies. Any future attempt to halt its nuclear or missile programs could be met with actions capable of severely damaging the world economy.
Taken together, these elements demonstrate that delaying confrontation increases the risks rather than reducing them. As Iran approaches a threshold where its military and strategic capabilities can no longer be effectively countered, the ability of Israel and other states to defend themselves is eliminated.
America and Israel acting before these capabilities were fully realized was the only way to prevent a more dangerous and uncontrollable situation later. So far Iran, Syria, and Lebanon have killed hundreds of thousands of their own citizens. The United States and Israel are stopping this slaughter of innocents.