It’s fund-raising
time for natural climate change deniers and a photo-shopped image of a polar
bear on a tiny ice floe in a vast ice-free ocean was used as their “poster boy”
Brad Keyes at The
Conversation defended its use: “The problem is, only sensational
exaggeration makes the kind of story that will get politicians’—and
readers’—attention. So, yes, climate scientists might exaggerate, but in
today’s world, this is the only way to assure any political action and thus more
federal financing to reduce the scientific uncertainty.”
Pity the polar bear. Global temperature was up 1°C, Arctic summers were 5°-8°C warmer, and Arctic summer ice
was virtually gone. This occurred annually for thousands of years
130,000-115,000 years ago during the Eemian interglacial, and hit its peak
125,000 years ago. And the polar bear survived.
The polar bear also survived during the recent Holocene
Climatic Optimum, 9,000-5,000 years ago, when Arctic temperatures were similar
to the Eemian period, with substantially less sea ice than the present. And the
polar bear survived.
None of these facts of polar bear survival during previous
warmer, lower sea ice periods, seems to have sunk in with the natural climate
change deniers. Recent periods of greater warmth, higher sea levels, and lower
Arctic sea ice should register something in their feverish minds: our current
warming following the Little Ice Age, the coldest period since the end of the
Ice Age, is modest and unremarkable compared to previous warm periods. Within
the past 10,000 years, the Holocene Climatic Optimum, and the following cooler
Minoan, Roman, and Medieval warm periods were all warmer than the present. And
the polar bears survived them all.
In fact, the polar bear population quadrupled 1960-2000, and
is up 10%-20% from 2000 to the present.
Surviving? They’re thriving.
No comments:
Post a Comment